Camshaft Test

This test was performed on the CJM Dyno by Ryan (rm2932) and Dave (mister2ownzU).

For the testing on 272 Intake and 264 Exhaust they tried it at HKS degree specs and then I108 and E112 lobe centerline.

After the test results, Ryan kept with the standard HKS 264/264 combo.

About the wavyness in the graphs... that was a problem with the Profec B, you could watch the psi fluttering up and down 1 psi and hear it in the wastegate dump. 

If you download the files you can view the logged A/F and see that it was very consistent after a few runs of tuning each combo.

Engine Specs:

  • CJM 2.2 liter stroker (8.4:1 compression)
  • CJM ported head w/
  • Ferrea 1mm over valves
  • Ferrea dual springs
  • Ferrea retainers
  • Jun valve guides
  • Greddy T67 turbo kit with 10cm exhaust housing
  • Custom intake manifold
  • Ford racing 70 mm Throttle body
  • XS engineering Skyline core IC 24 X 10.5 X 3
  • Hux racing fuel rail
  • Precision 95 lb/hr injectors
  • Electromotive TECII






Stock 15psi


Stock 15 vs 20psi


HKS 264/264 15psi


HKS 264/264 15 vs 20 psi


264/264 vs 264/272 @ HKS Degree Spec @ 20psi


264/264 vs 272/264 @ HKS Degree Spec @ 20psi


272/264 @ 20 psi @ HKS Degree vs I108/E112


264/264 HKS Degree vs 272/264 I108/E112 @ 20 psi


272/272 Low Lift @ 15psi


272/272 Low Lift @ 15 vs 20 psi


272/272 Low Lift VS 264/264 Low Lift @ 20psi


272/272 High Lift vs 272/272 Low Lift @ 20psi


Toda 280/280 @ 15psi


Toda 280/280 at 15 vs 20psi

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.